![]() those of us who normally respond on this forum) do not recommend the use of reverse scheduling. ![]() Note that with the first two tasks the start-to-finish relationship requires that Taskġ not finish prior to Task 2 starting, and also allows Task 1 to finish as late at Task 2 finishes. I've added the Early Start and Late Start field along with the Early Finish and Late Finish fields to better show what is happening. The first two have a start-to-finish relationship (like the tasks of question in Nicole's schedule) whereas the second two have a normalįinish-to-start relationship. In the example I show two sets of 1 day tasks. This seems quite strange but is more easily understood by way of example. Starts but rather that the successor task cannot finish until the predecessor task starts, INCLUDING not finishing until the predecessor task finishes. It does NOT mean that the "driven" (successor) task must finish before the "driving" (predecessor) task However with a start-to-finish link the meaning is less obvious. Start until the predecessor task is finished, pretty straightforward. ![]() With a normal (default) finish-to-start link the successor task can NOT Nicole sent me her file and once I saw it, the answer to her issue wasn't something I had thought about before but it has to do with the subtle nature of a start-to-finish type link. Nicole and others who may be interested in this thread, ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |